|
Monster Rancher Metropolis: Monster Rancher 4 Archive (PS2): Miscellaneous Q&A (Post New Questions Here) : Maxed Monsters? By Takuin on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 07:12 am:
Just a general question to see what has happened in the life of MR4. Has anybody maxed a monster out in MR4? Just trying to find out where this game is at after such a long time. By Infernus on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 10:58 am:
Many other's could delete it as well, but It's not going to be me. It's a legit question. By Iron_Datu on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 11:07 am:
I am still unsure whether it is possible in MR4 to max out ALL 5 of a creature's stats. Right now, I can max out 3 stats and have decent gains in life (see the thread on breeding methods). The best we have so far is a Golem with stats totalling around 3900. (And it is probably possible to reach 4000 to 4100, but beyond that...) By Infernus on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 11:45 am: Nice typo. You mean all six, not five. I'm surprised you, of all people, has not broken 4000. Especially with a Golem. I've actually got my sights set on 4500. It doesn't seem like it'd be that hard if I was willing to dish out the cash. By Strunks on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 03:21 pm:
I'm sure there's always that point in any MR game where everyone assumes you cannot max every stat. By Iron_Datu on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 04:35 am: On considerable reflection, I think Infernus is right, 4500 is achievable. At present though we are working out a method with Speed/Int creatures, so it will be a bit of time before I can do another golem with a focus on really maxxing out the stats. By Slapshotz54 on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 02:59 pm: here comes some nice little math for you. for a Golem that lives 224 weeks that has the maximum starting values of all stats through combination, you would need to average +22.5 in stat gains, every single week. (5994-(my encyplopedia entry)632*1.5=5046 5046/224=22.526...). If you lose lifespan at all or have to rest at all, the value of the average stat gains go up. At this point in time, i cannot see this being accomplished. By Infernus on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 04:02 pm:
Your math is flawed. You can't just take the total and mulitply it by 1.5. Each stat needs to be done individually.
Base Golem stats are: 110, 170, 80, 65, 50, 150. Therefore, starting stats are: 154, 255, 112, 84, 65, 225. Our Golem with maximum values is not 948 (632 *1.5), no, it's 895. Even if I had them in different order, it wouldn't make a whole lot of difference. I don't even know how you got 632. Pure Golem, from book, totals to 625. So, 5099/224 = 22.76 (22.8) per week. Now let's get really funky.
Numbers are in weeks. Let's assume that during stage one you get 11 per drill, stage two gets 27, stage three gets 57, stage four gets 22, and stage five gets 8. 45*11 = 495 60*27 = 1620 60*57 = 3420 45*22 = 990 14*8 = 112 Total: 6637 Plus the original 895 gives us: 7532 Excess: 1538 Now, this is assuming everything goes absolutely perfect at every stage, that you don't rest, and that you don't fight. That's not going to happen. So let's steal some weeks from stage three to account for rests and fights up to class S (from C), that's 12 fights, and to keep our numbers clean, we'll give this bad boy 18 rests (which, IMO, is too much). This makes stage three 30*57 = 1710. So we've cut it in half. Our new total is 5822. Just out of reach of maxx. But you know what, I actually see this as reasonable. It'd be hell to get every thing perfect like that, but hey, if you have the patience, it's worth a go. I can see a Golem hitting the 5000-5500 range eventually. Does this give us maxx? No. It pushes us closer. This is why I think we're missing something. If not, then it looks like 5500, a ridiculously hard number to aquire, would be tops. Golem was just used as an example because Slappy used it. We have to remember that specials tend to have the uncanny ability to start with much higher stats, that is to say, Gadgeter G might be a top prospect monster, depending on its lifespan. By Boxin_ra on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 01:06 am:
I have not seen it on the site but I found this to be a great tool. By Anonymous on Monday, July 4, 2005 - 09:28 pm:
Sweet. And here all I can do is max out a monster with Lv. 2 Magic gadgets/Wind Drums and enough Oily Oils and Shimp/Pork/Golden Peaches (the secret max-out item you've all been wasting your time ignoring. It's the hidden link which makes maxing my monsters out possible, and I won't tell how to get it! :P) to make any Deathwing (Phoenix/Unknown) or Mushtan (Plant/Unknown)cringe. Oh, and those are the two monsters which are maxable(besides the un-cd-generatable-class-E super-PWNage-Garu which you recieve at the VERY beginning of the game or a tri fused Dark Antlan ) So back to my Deathwing and Mushtan (which I used to mock because of it's starting weakness) they can PWN anyone. Takes a lot of work and making then go without rest for half-a-year once they hit their "PWNAGE is becoming vey mature" prime (once again, Golden Peach's effect makes that possible, and it's worth million G!) I can easily get at least a couple thousand points in without worrying about focus, tiredness, hunger, injury/sickness, or stress (IMO, the ultimate maxximum stat dream crusher; it's why I couldn't pull it off w/o my uber fruit). Indeed, I am teh best. See ya! *yamyamkissykiss* By Anonymous on Monday, July 4, 2005 - 09:39 pm: Heh, just kidding! Although I did manage to max a Mushtan and combo Deathwing, I lied about the special effect of the Peach. It only severely dampers those qualities for a few months (I said it completely eliminated them). Look in Torble during spring at the University(it's the least I could do to make it up to you.) Chances are VERY slim, but just maybe... Sowwy! :'( By MrGG on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 07:16 am:
I'm going to need proof of this so called maxing? I'd like to know a few things... By Lisa Shock on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 12:16 pm:
You do realise that the Moderators can see who is posting as Anonymous? You also realise that talking about items without proof of their existence, and making claims of doing things no one else has while saying you will not demonstrate how is grounds for being banned from the site? By Infernus on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 12:19 pm:
I already have, and will continue to look into this. If no one else comes up with anything, and you provide no proof, I guess that makes you wrong, right? By Lisa Shock on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 12:30 pm: And, by the way, we need this possible without ProAction Replay, or you are insta-banned. By Iron_Datu on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 03:00 pm: Wow I really want to see if there is such a thing. A part of me wants to believe Mr. Anonymous, but my more rational side already feels this is fishier than a Zilla's doo doo. By Lisa Shock on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 06:39 pm:
"I will go back to my Action Replay Pro and somehow make the im-frickin'-possible, well, possible." |